Weak Engineering in Nuclear Plant Could Lead to Degrade in Safety Culture

Weak Engineering in Nuclear Plant Could Lead to Degrade in Safety Culture

The execution of a better safety culture requires Holmes’s capacity to utilize logic and monitoring where loss potential resides at work to identify. Whilst the Job Hazard Analysis supplies us with nature and the structure of job hazards by offering a way the connections of occupation requirements and hazard, JHAs are not sufficient to ensure that the controls stay successful. A further evaluation of the 80% indicates that 70% of these errors are because of organizational weakness and 30% because of human error. This signifies Undetected deficiencies in equipment procedures or values which create job requirements that provoke error or hamper the integrity of controllers.

These latent mistakes are embedded in the business. Weaknesses that could function as result flags that could create serious episodes and degrade a safety culture are referred to by research by the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations. The INPO Concluded these latent conditions are conducive to accumulation and the degradation of controls that were flawed and performance. These are warning flags. Controls inside a Safety Culture you use the flags to evaluate your own work whilst the Handbook is written for nuclear energy operations. Overconfidence – The Numbers are good, and this team is living off past successes.

The staff doesn’t recognize low-level problems and remain unaware of hazards. Isolationism – There are few connections with some other comparable organizations, professional groups, regulatory and industry groups. Consequently, the business lags the industry in many regions of performance and can be unaware of it. Defensive and opponent relationships – The mindset toward these regulatory agencies or professional groups is defensive or Do the minimum. Internal for the organization, employees aren’t involved and aren’t listened to, and raising problems isn’t valued. Informal Operational and Weak Engineering – Operations criteria, formality, and subject are lacking. Other issues, initiatives, or special projects overshadow plant operational focus.

Engineering is weak, usually through a loss of talent, or lacks alignment with operational priorities. Design basis isn’t a priority, and design margins erode with time. Production Priorities – Important equipment issues linger, and repairs are postponed whilst the plant remains inline or in production. Safety is assured and isn’t explicitly emphasized in staff connections and site communications. Inadequate Change Management – Organizational changes, staff reductions, retirement programs, and relocations are initiated before their impacts are fully considered. Processes and procedures don’t support strong performance following management changes. Plant Operational Events – Loss generating Event significance is unrecognized or underplayed, and responses to events and unsafe conditions aren’t aggressive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *